Темная лошадка
Feb. 13th, 2008 02:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
yuccaDetermining how McCain would act as president has thus become a highly sophisticated exercise in figuring out whom he's misleading and why. Nearly everyone can find something to like in McCain. Liberals can admire his progressive instincts and hope that he is dishonestly pandering to the right in order to get through the primary. Conservatives can believe he will follow whatever course his conservative advisers set out for him and will feel bound by whatever promises he has made to them. Even the ideological tendency McCain is most strongly identified with--neoconservative foreign policy--is, as John B. Judis explained in The New Republic, a relatively recent development: McCain originally opposed intervention in Bosnia and worried about a bloody ground campaign before the first Gulf war (see "Neo-McCain," October 16, 2006). McCain's advisers include not only neoconservatives but also the likes of Henry Kissinger and Brent Scowcroft. It would hardly be unimaginable for McCain to revert to his old realism, especially if Iraq continues to fail at political reconciliation. He could easily be the president who ends the war.
The amazing thing about McCain is that his reputation for principled consistency has remained completely intact. It is his strongest cudgel against opponents. Wall Street Journal editorial page columnist Kimberley Strassel recently gushed that McCain is "no flip-flopper." "Like or dislike Mr. McCain's views," she added, "Americans know what they are." Then, in the very next paragraph, she wrote that McCain will now be "as pure as the New Hampshire snow on the two core issues of taxes and judges" and that "[t]he key difference between Mr. McCain in 2000 and 2008 is that he ... appears intent on making amends" to conservatives.
It is a truly impressive skill McCain has--the ability to adopt new beliefs and convince his new allies that his conversion is genuine (or, at least, irreversible) while simultaneously strengthening their belief in the immutability of his principles. I suspect that, in the end, it will come to tears for McCain's new allies--just as it has for most of those, including me, who thought they had a bead on him in the past. But, really, who knows?
Maverick vs. Iceman by Jonathan Chait, The New Republic
The amazing thing about McCain is that his reputation for principled consistency has remained completely intact. It is his strongest cudgel against opponents. Wall Street Journal editorial page columnist Kimberley Strassel recently gushed that McCain is "no flip-flopper." "Like or dislike Mr. McCain's views," she added, "Americans know what they are." Then, in the very next paragraph, she wrote that McCain will now be "as pure as the New Hampshire snow on the two core issues of taxes and judges" and that "[t]he key difference between Mr. McCain in 2000 and 2008 is that he ... appears intent on making amends" to conservatives.
It is a truly impressive skill McCain has--the ability to adopt new beliefs and convince his new allies that his conversion is genuine (or, at least, irreversible) while simultaneously strengthening their belief in the immutability of his principles. I suspect that, in the end, it will come to tears for McCain's new allies--just as it has for most of those, including me, who thought they had a bead on him in the past. But, really, who knows?
Maverick vs. Iceman by Jonathan Chait, The New Republic
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 09:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 09:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:16 pm (UTC)Он вполне центрист, хотя со стороны консервативной. Как Либерман центрист со стороны либеральной. Поэтому у него нету того, что тут называется base, но зато есть широкая поддержка среди многих. И уважение, но это по другим причинам.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 10:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 12:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 12:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 01:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 01:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 01:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 01:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 02:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 02:12 am (UTC)из той же статьи
Date: 2008-02-14 02:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 02:25 am (UTC)Каждый из кандидатов несет себя как олицетворение каких-то качеств - МакКейн - несгибаемость, опыт, Хиллари продает себя как женщина и годы правления ее мужа, Обама - цвет кожи, обаяние и перемены. Большинство избирателей это и оценивают. А программы кандидатов для интеллектуалов в LJ и на TV :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 03:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 04:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 07:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 09:13 pm (UTC)Это называется не "несгибаемость", а непотопляемость. Гнется он прекрасно, даже в преклонном возрасте. А не тонет известно что.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 09:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 09:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 09:20 pm (UTC)