(no subject)
Mar. 24th, 2009 02:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
yucca"The Dow fell 332.13 points on inauguration day," noted Barnes, holding this up as evidence that "The market's view is that an Obamanomics-driven economy looks grim." I'm trying to figure out the operating theory here. One possibility is that, before January 20, investors thought Obama would get cold feet, or that maybe President Bush would surround the White House with tanks and stay forever.
Я, пожалуй, добавлю про оглушительное молчание по поводу вчерашнего прыжка акций от людей, которые недавно утверждали, что Обама самолично вызвал их катастрофическое падение. По мне так ни то, ни другое на него не следует слишком торопливо вешать.
Я, пожалуй, добавлю про оглушительное молчание по поводу вчерашнего прыжка акций от людей, которые недавно утверждали, что Обама самолично вызвал их катастрофическое падение. По мне так ни то, ни другое на него не следует слишком торопливо вешать.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-24 10:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-24 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-25 08:28 am (UTC)This is about as meaningful as trying to calibrate lab scales on a ship being tossed by a high storm.
Even if you had some valid trend up in the stock market, it can be in interpreted two ways: that expectations of real profits went higher or that high inflation is expected. I favor the second intepretation based on the recent creation of more that $1T and promises to create more money in the future.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-25 08:33 am (UTC)Maybe that's because great minds tend to think for themselves rather than mistake commonalities for their own thinking.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-25 06:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-25 09:30 pm (UTC)